History of (tagg)Art...
HomeNatureIdentityRenaissanceBaroque

Nature

  • All Nature artworks
  • Landscape or Seascape in 2D
  • Animals in 2D or 3D
  • The Elements (Fire, Water, Wind or Earth) in 2D or 3D
  • +3 more topics

Identity

  • All Identity artworks
  • The Divine in 2D or 3D Works
  • Portraits in 2D Works
  • Portraits in 3D Works
  • +3 more topics

Renaissance

  • All Renaissance artworks
  • Religious Painting
  • Religious Sculpture
  • Mythological in 2D or 3D
  • +3 more topics

Baroque

  • All Baroque artworks
  • Religious Painting
  • Religious Sculpture
  • Mythological Painting
  • +6 more topics

About

A comprehensive study resource for Pearson Edexcel History of Art A-Level.

NatureIdentityRenaissanceBaroque

History of (tagg)Art... - A-Level Study Resource

Pearson Edexcel Specification

Admin
  1. Home
  2. Renaissance
  3. Palazzo Medici

Palazzo Medici

Michelozzo, 1444-84

RenaissanceSecular ArchitectureFlorence
Palazzo Medici by Michelozzo
Palazzo Medici (Palazzo Medici-Riccardi), Florence, by Michelozzo di Bartolomeo, begun 1444. View of the facade showing the graduated rustication, biforate windows, and classical cornice.

Overview

About This Work

Palazzo Medici (also called Palazzo Medici-Riccardi after its acquisition by the Riccardi family in 1659) is a Renaissance palace in Florence designed by architect Michelozzo di Bartolomeo and commissioned by Cosimo de' Medici the Elder in 1444. Construction began immediately and continued through approximately 1460, with final details completed by 1484. The palace stands as a turning point in the history of civic architecture: it is the first monumental Renaissance palace built in Florence and became "the prototype of the Tuscan Renaissance palazzo," establishing conventions that would be followed by all subsequent Renaissance palace design. The palazzo represents a brilliant political and architectural compromise. When Cosimo commissioned the work, he rejected designs by Filippo Brunelleschi—the greatest architect of the age—because Brunelleschi's proposals were "too bombastic and pretentious" and might "arouse the envy of fellow citizens." Instead, Cosimo chose Michelozzo's more refined and restrained design, which successfully displayed Medici wealth and power while maintaining the appearance of republican modesty and civic responsibility. The result is a building of extraordinary visual sophistication: a three-story facade organized through graduated stonework (rough rustication at the base ascending to smooth ashlar above), crowned by a revolutionary classical cornice, surrounding a colonnaded courtyard organized according to Renaissance principles of proportion and mathematical harmony. The Palazzo Medici demonstrates Renaissance synthesis of medieval and classical traditions. The rusticated ground story recalls medieval fortress palaces, conveying strength and impregnability. The refined upper stories, with their classical moldings and proportioned windows, express cultivation and learning. The crowning cornice—a ten-foot-high classical entablature removed from its traditional context and adapted to contemporary use—expresses mastery of classical vocabulary and its modern application. Internally, the colonnaded courtyard with Corinthian columns and Donatello's bronze David expresses classical ideals of beauty and proportion while serving practical functions as the palace's spatial and organizational heart.

Visual Analysis

Composition

The facade of the Palazzo Medici is organized into three distinct horizontal registers, each progressively refined and reduced in height as one ascends. This tripartite elevation is not merely decorative division but rather expresses Renaissance ideals of rationality, order, and classicism applied at human scale. The ground story is distinguished by large arched openings (originally five on each major face) with rusticated masonry. The rustication consists of large stone blocks with rough-cut surfaces and chamfered (beveled) edges, creating a visually textured surface with strong light-and-shadow effects. This rough stonework recalls medieval fortified palaces and conveys an impression of solidity, strength, and impregnability. Between the arches are benches where merchants, clients, and suppliants waited—a design feature that physically integrates the palace with civic space and the public. The rustication on the ground story served multiple symbolic functions. First, the rough-faced stone was expensive and rare—its use on a palace facade announced the Medici family's extraordinary wealth. Indeed, rustication "soon became seen as a status symbol," and the choice of materials became part of "power politics" in Renaissance Florence. Second, the rustication conveyed political meaning: a powerful merchant family needed to express sufficient authority and military readiness to protect Florence yet could not appear as a military threat to republican governance. The second story features paired biforate windows (windows divided by a central mullion or colonette into two lights). These windows display classical moldings and rounded arches rather than the three-lobed Gothic arches that had dominated earlier medieval architecture. The stone here becomes finely dressed ashlar—carefully squared blocks with smooth, refined surfaces in stark contrast to the rough rustication below. This progression creates a visual hierarchy: crude strength at the base supports civilized refinement above. The building is "three stories high and ten bays wide," making it "considerably wider than it was tall." The horizontal emphasis is reinforced by stringcourses (horizontal moldings running across the facade between stories) and the bold roofline cornice. This emphasis on horizontality creates a sense of stability, territorial control, and spread—appropriate to a palace occupied by a merchant banking family whose power derived from commercial networks extending across the Mediterranean and Europe.

Colour & Light

At the roofline sits an enormous classical cornice—approximately ten feet high, projecting boldly outward from the building's face. This is the crowning feature of the palazzo, and its introduction here was revolutionary. Medieval palaces typically ended with crenellations (notched defensive walls). Michelozzo instead crowned the palazzo with a classical entablature—the molded band that in ancient Greek and Roman architecture had crowned columns and colonnades. This represents a transformation of classical vocabulary. In ancient buildings, the cornice was part of a complete entablature (architrave, frieze, cornice) that crowned a colonnade. Michelozzo removed the cornice from this traditional context and adapted it to a contemporary palace, scaling it according to the proportions of the entire building rather than merely the uppermost story. This adaptation epitomizes the Renaissance approach to classical architecture: not slavish imitation but intelligent study and creative reapplication. The cornice's visual impact is extraordinary. It projects 10 feet beyond the wall plane, creating dramatic shadow effects that emphasize the building's mass and solidity. It acts as a visual "crown," suggesting authority and power. The shadows cast by the cornice change throughout the day, creating dynamic visual effects. The cornice became a standard feature for all subsequent Renaissance palaces and other buildings, establishing a precedent that influenced architecture for centuries. The texture progression from very rough to very smooth is crucial to the palazzo's visual and philosophical impact. The graduated stonework creates a sense that "rough/strong base" supports "refined/elegant structure above." The progression embodies Renaissance ideals: order emerging from elemental strength, civilization built upon foundation of power.

Materials & Technique

At the heart of the palazzo lies the courtyard of the columns (cortile dei colonnati)—an open, colonnaded space far larger than those of earlier medieval palaces. This courtyard is the "pulsing heart" of the palazzo, surrounded on all sides by loggias (covered colonnaded porches) providing sheltered circulation and visual unity. The ground-floor loggia consists of five-arch arcades on each of the four sides, supported by Corinthian columns rather than the octagonal pillars of earlier medieval palaces. The Corinthian capitals, with their acanthus-leaf decoration, express the "new taste for Classical antiquity" that characterized the Renaissance. Above the arcades runs a classical entablature—horizontal molded bands creating a decorative framework. The frieze above the entablature displays sgraffito decoration (scratched and painted decorative work) by Maso di Bartolommeo. Most prominently, at the center of each arcade's upper surface is the Medici coat of arms (the palle—six spheres arranged in heraldic configuration). Flanking the coat of arms are large-scale replicas of eight ancient cameos created by artists from Donatello's workshop. This display of the Medici emblem and classical antiquities transforms the courtyard into a visual assertion of family authority and cultural sophistication. At the center of the courtyard stands a bronze statue of David by Donatello—one of the supreme masterpieces of Renaissance sculpture. The David is not merely ornamental but symbolically significant: David is a symbol of Florentine liberty, the youthful hero who defeated the tyrant Goliath. By commissioning this statue for their courtyard, the Medici family identified themselves with the cause of Florentine freedom, assuring fellow citizens that despite their extraordinary wealth and power, they were committed to republican values.

Historical Context

Context

Cosimo de' Medici (1389–1464), known as Cosimo the Elder, was the patriarch of the Medici banking family. Though he never held official title as ruler, he exercised enormous political power through his vast wealth, strategic patronage, and influence over Florence's oligarchic government. In 1444, when Cosimo commissioned the palazzo, he had just consolidated unprecedented power following the defeat of the Milanese and the death of his rival Rinaldo degli Albizzi. Commissioning a palazzo of unprecedented magnificence was an assertion of Medici supremacy. The palace was to be built "close by the church of San Lorenzo," the Medici family's church, making it a visible symbol of family dominance in this portion of the city. Yet Cosimo's political sophistication required that the palace not appear so ostentatiously grand as to violate republican sensibilities. Florence was technically a republic with an oligarchic governing structure; Cosimo's power, though nearly absolute in practice, was exercised through invisible manipulation of institutions rather than through visible tyranny. Cosimo first approached Filippo Brunelleschi—the acknowledged master of Renaissance architecture, the designer of the Florence Cathedral dome—to design his palace. Brunelleschi proposed a design. Yet Cosimo rejected it. According to Giorgio Vasari, Cosimo found Brunelleschi's design "too bombastic and pretentious," fearing it "might have aroused the envy of his fellow citizens instead of being an example of beauty and an ornament for the city." This reveals that Cosimo's rejection was based not on aesthetic disagreement but on political calculation. Cosimo then turned to Michelozzo di Bartolomeo (1396–1472), a sculptor and architect trained in the workshop of Lorenzo Ghiberti. Michelozzo's design satisfied Cosimo's requirements: it was impressive yet measured, powerful yet politically appropriate. The result—ironically—proved far more influential than Brunelleschi's rejected design would have been. Michelozzo's palazzo became "the prototype of the Tuscan Renaissance palazzo," establishing conventions that dominated Renaissance palace design for centuries.

Key Themes

Connection to Renaissance

Exam Focus Points

Critical Perspectives

Consider how the Palazzo Medici functions as a political statement while maintaining aesthetic excellence. Analyze the significance of Cosimo's rejection of Brunelleschi's design in favor of Michelozzo's more measured approach. Examine how the graduated rustication creates visual hierarchy and political meaning. Compare the palazzo's tripartite facade to other Renaissance buildings you have studied. Discuss the courtyard's role as both functional space and symbolic assertion of Medici authority. Consider how Donatello's David in the courtyard relates to broader themes of Florentine civic identity. Evaluate the palazzo's influence on subsequent Renaissance architecture and its status as "the prototype of the Tuscan Renaissance palazzo."

On this page

OverviewVisual AnalysisHistorical ContextKey ThemesExam Focus Points